Hi Gabonator1
I too am a fan of the quad. However, I am sure the original authors must be busy with something else. Otherwise, it seems to me a brilliant idea to have a pocket scope that can do so much. In fact I loved the Nano so much, I blindly purchased the quad and sold my nano to a client. Now I realise it wasn't a smart move.
I like what you're doing with the UI and I wish I can help. I wish I can help in some way. I am used to coding a few types of processors and Arm7 is one of them. I haven't really had the time to indulge in the hacking of this scope, but your idea looks promising.
Let me know if you need any specific help and I'll try to assist whichever way I can. I cannot promise much because I am pretty loaded at the moment.
I sure hope to have some of the following
* better / reliable triggering
* better calibration procedures
* a better DSO quad.
Regards
Jerson
http://jerson.co.in
Statistics : Posted by gabonator1 • on Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:17 pm • Replies 88 • Views 24918
I too am a fan of the quad. However, I am sure the original authors must be busy with something else. Otherwise, it seems to me a brilliant idea to have a pocket scope that can do so much. In fact I loved the Nano so much, I blindly purchased the quad and sold my nano to a client. Now I realise it wasn't a smart move.
I like what you're doing with the UI and I wish I can help. I wish I can help in some way. I am used to coding a few types of processors and Arm7 is one of them. I haven't really had the time to indulge in the hacking of this scope, but your idea looks promising.
Let me know if you need any specific help and I'll try to assist whichever way I can. I cannot promise much because I am pretty loaded at the moment.
I sure hope to have some of the following
* better / reliable triggering
* better calibration procedures
* a better DSO quad.
Regards
Jerson
http://jerson.co.in
Statistics : Posted by gabonator1 • on Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:17 pm • Replies 88 • Views 24918